Role of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis in the Reconstruction of Crime Scene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53573/rhimrj.2025.v12n2.004Keywords:
Bloodstain pattern analysis, technology, reconstruction, crime, crime scene, blood, spatterAbstract
Bloodstain pattern analysis or BPA is the analysis of the size, shape and distribution of bloodstains in crime scene which not just focuses on finding the angle and direction of bloodstain but also extent to the detection of the blood to the DNA profiling which aids in the reconstruction of events. There is certain method used in BPA ranging from traditional method such as the use of trigonometric calculation and stringing method to advanced software such as HemoSpat, HemoVision, etc. Even though there has been a vast improvement in BPA, it is still not without any challenges such as the risk of contamination, the variability of blood behaviour in various environmental circumstances and lastly human errors. While the reliability of BPA has been strengthened with the recent improvement in technologies, in order to improve its accuracy, legality and application in forensic investigations, more study and standards are required.
References
Rotter, G., Raffino, C., Burrascano, G., Spagnolo, E.V., Baldino, G., Asmundo, A., (2024). The Role of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) in Reconstructing the Dynamics of Forensic Cases.
doi: 10.7417 CT.2024.5099
James, S.H., Kish, P.E., & Sutton, T.P. (2014). Bloodstain patterns. In James, S.H., Nordby, J.J., Bell, S. (Eds), Forensic science: An introduction to scientific and investigative techniques (4th ed., pp. 68-101). CRC Press.
https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/BloodstainPatterns.pdf
Houck, M.M., & Siegel, J.A. (2010). Serology and bloodstain pattern analysis. In Fundamentals of forensic science (2nd ed., pp. 230-252).
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374989-5.00010-7
https://forensicreader.com/bloodstain-pattern-analysis/#google_vignette
Cho, Y., Springer, F., Tulleners, F.A., Ristenpart, W.D. (2015). Quantitative bloodstain analysis: differentiation of contact transfer pattern versus spatter patterns on fabric via microscopic inspection. Forensic Science International, 249, 233-240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.021
Mohal, A.K., Kaur, G. (2023) Current Trends in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis and its Forensic Significance.
Gardner, R.M., & Krouskup, D. (2018). Practical crime scene processing and investigation. CRC Press.
LeMay, J. (2003). Detection of blood with luminol. Law Enforcement Technology, 30(6), 140, 142, 145.
https://www.bluestar-forensic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/jfi_56__bluestar_luminol_comparison.pdf
https://www.bluestar-forensic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/watkins_brown_luminol_bs.pdf
Templeman, H. (1990). Errors in blood droplet impact angle reconstruction using a protractor. Journal of Forensic Identification, 40(1), 15-22.
Wonder, A. Y. (2007). Trigonometry in bloodstain pattern evidence: Math use in question. In Bloodstain Pattern Evidence (pp. 33-47).
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370482-5/50058-6
https://forensicfield.blog/blood-spatter-analysis/
Nirupama, G. S. (2024). Advances in forensic bloodstain pattern analysis: A review of current methods and future directions. International Journal of Innovative Research in Technology, 11(5), 2366.
Moza, B., Mukherjee, D., & Verma, P. (2023). Blood stain pattern analysis: A comprehensive review of methods, reliability of computerized analysis, and future advancements. Zenodo.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8213482
Dryzal, D. (2018). Bloodstain pattern analysis: Applications and challenges. D.U.Quark, 2(2), Article 7.